CoreyWallace.me - All Opinion, Always
  • Home
  • Ponderings
  • Tech Bytes
  • Links
  • Contact Info

absolutism: the new big bad

1/23/2013

0 Comments

 
Recently the President labeled the NRA and gun owners at large, absolutists. The President may have meant this as a derogatory term so as to portray said groups as closed minded and “out of the mainstream” but that is not the meaning of the word. Let me define it for you.

Absolutism: 1) the principle or the exercise of complete and unrestricted power in government 2) any theory hold that values, principles, etc., are absolute and not relative, dependent, or changeable. Syn: totalitarianism

After reading that definition, hopefully, one can see my confusion. The first definition more aptly applies to the President that it does to the group to which he was referring (also note synonym). The second isn’t by default a bad thing. We hold to many values and beliefs that we believe are unchangeable (the fact that murder, rape, lying, cheating, stealing, etc are all unacceptable in modern society for example). 

Instead a well-reasoned American can only assume that the President means to incite conflict where none should exist. The “right to keep and bear arms” is an absolute right. This fact is not up for negotiation or debate. The 2nd Amendment was ratified as part as the Bill of Rights on December 15th, 1791. Since that time we, as Americans, have considered it our absolute right to own the firearms we choose.  Of this we can be absolutely sure and of which there is no debate.

Instead the President is attempting to shift the debate away from where it should be, our mental healthcare crisis, to a place that’s absolutely nonsensical.  He is attempting to get rid of a symptom rather than a cause. Instead of trying to actually find a way to solve the real problem, he is twisting the facts to suit his own agenda. Never has it been proposed that the most effective way to end drunk driving is to make it harder to buy a car or limit how much gas you can buy at one time (the price of gas not withstanding).  Except the right to drive or own an automobile is not guaranteed in the constitution as is the right to bear arms. Staying on that same argument, I can buy virtually as much alcohol as I want in one trip as well; why not limit that? Remember we have tried to ban alcohol before and all that did was create a lucrative nationwide black market.

The moral of the story is that those who mean to do evil, will. Many people each day do much harm exercising their 1st Amendment rights. The government harms many more people each day by ignoring our 4th and 5th Amendment rights. In an age where everything is subject to the whims of the time, we cannot allow ourselves to ignore rights, freedoms, or duties because of fads or twisted facts. If our nation collectively decides that the 2nd Amendment no longer applies, then we need to amend the constitution to remove it. Otherwise, let us focus on things we can change like: better treatment and diagnosing of mental illness, research into the causes of mental illness, research into the drugs that we use for mental illness to determine if the side effects risks are greater than the condition that is being treated, stronger oversight, authority, and accountability of the FDA, just to name a few.

We always hear about the all-powerful gun lobby and the evil it promotes but let me put things in perspective as I close, allowing you to make your own judgement. Between 1998 and 2005 the Big Pharma lobby spent $900 million lobbying at the federal level (i.e. congress).  Between 2001 and 2010 (this includes the time in which the assault weapons ban was allowed to lapse) the NRA spent $2.7 million lobbying at the federal level. Now which lobby was supposed to be untouchable and  all-powerful again? Which lobby do you believe has more power over legislation? Why is it when someone dies due to drunk driving, that same reason is listed as the cause of death but when someone shoots up a school, who was also taking Xanax or Paxil, it is instead listed as a regular homicide? Now we know who is really buttering congress’ bread, don’t we?

0 Comments

ANOTHER CANARY IN THE MINE

1/19/2013

0 Comments

 
In recent weeks the debate over the reach, definition and original intent of the 2nd Amendment has been re-ignited yet again. In the wake of the horrible events of Sandy Hook, our nation is soul searching in an attempt to balance rights against security. As much as I would love to dive into the absurdity that is the current proposal from the President and the overall 2nd Amendment discussion nationwide. I would only be mentioning part of the larger war on our rights as a people.

Over the past decade we have seen our personal liberties slowly taken away by an overreaching and dictatorial federal government with no respect for the rights and/or liberties of its citizens. In 2008 a President was elected who promised to right the system. Instead over the last 4 years we have seen an acceleration in the systematic destruction of our rights.

We have seen the 1st Amendment re-interpreted to protect a religious hate group masquerading as a church protesting the funerals of soldiers and children. Yet, that same 1st Amendment has been ignored as the definition of “hate speech” grows ever larger. Our judicial system continues to try to “level the playing field” by slowly but surely inching towards criminalizing offensive speech.

In regards to our 2nd Amendment rights, this can only be viewed as the next volley in the total assault on our constitution rights. All branches of our government have at every opportunity weakened our constitution; making it say what they want it to say. Whenever one attempts to defend this amendment it rarely ends with civility, usually devolving to a shouting match. Our “leaders” constantly discuss the 2nd Amendment through the lens of what is needed for hunting. Unfortunately, there is no mention of hunting in said amendment. Instead it says ”A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This can rightly (and historically) be interpreted with a two fold meaning. 1) So that in times of national duress a militia can be raised instantaneously by the people of the people and 2) In the event our government becomes dictatorial and takes our rights away (sound familiar?) we can take our government and country back. This is yet another example of trying to change the meaning of a constitutional guarantee.

The 4th and 5th Amendments have also endured a relentless onslaught. The FBI is continuously trying to push the boundaries around the 4th Amendment and luckily the last attempt (which made it to SCOTUS) was struck down. In regards to the 5th Amendment, it received its last notable trampling when Anwar Al Alaki (an American citizen) was killed while riding in a convoy across the Yemeni desert. All because he was labeled a terrorist, our President was able to act as judge, jury and executioner. Now our government hid behind the small clause in the constitution that mentions “public danger”. Ill leave you to decide if a man riding in a convoy through the desert is a public danger. Regardless of what he may have said, he was protected under the 1st Amendment.

This current fight over the 2nd Amendment is but a canary in the mine. We the people are slowly losing our government to those who would twist it to do their bidding. We are losing the Union which has stood for over 200 years. It is enduring an attack against its very soul. The question is can we save it or does it have to be born anew to flourish?

0 Comments

Politicians Alive and Well, Statesmen Dead and Gone

9/23/2011

0 Comments

 
I once held great hope for America. Before Obama, Bush, 9/11, tax cuts/hikes, war, death panels... The list goes on and on. I remember a day when I believed that the United States of America was the greatest country in the history of civilization and that may have been true. I am not sure when or how it happened but, in my opinion, America has passed the point of no return.
Some would say that, politically, it is no worse that at many other times in our nation's history and they may be right. However, something feels different about this new age in which we live. We live in a time, and I use this expression often, in which one side is burying their heads in the sand and the other is placing their hands over their ears and screaming with closed eyes. Neither can see, hear, communicate, or find the other. This is where our hyper-partisan two party political system has brought us to. 
Our country needs they very medicine it is not willing to take, truth. We refuse to acknowledge truth, on both sides. We skew facts to fit our opinions and damn those who even questions our beliefs. We cannot handle criticism of any sort and call those that do, un-patriotic. We watch our President, whomever that may be, stand before congress every year and declare that "the state of our union is strong". These are lies, our union hasn't been strong for some time. We tell ourselves this to help us ignore the elephant in the room, America is growing weaker by the day and not one politician has the guts to say it.
It is not because of our dwindling economic or political influence that America will one day fall. It is because our two political parties care more about making the other look bad or taking a quote out of context than they do about strengthening our union. They would rather see the other party lose an election than see true progress happen that would make our country truly better. The very thing that created this union and caused it to flourish, the will of the people, will also be its un-doing. We no longer base our lives on reason and fact but on opinions and gossip. We would more quickly lie to someone to have them leave us alone than tell them a cold hard truth. We are a nation of spineless automatons and we like it that way. We are Americans and we cannot fall, we cannot fail, and we will not be denied our way. We believe it is our right to run the world as we see fit daring any who would question us. We refuse to see how wrong we really are. God have mercy on us...
I hope that we will soon turn away from our ways and do what is truly best for our nation. I fear, however, this will not happen and we will continue down this disastrous road we are on. We will want our collective conscience soothed until the very end. And when that day comes, the last day, we will look back and say "My God, fellow citizens, what have we done?"

"A house divided against itself cannot stand." - Abraham Lincoln
"Politicians are a set of men who have interests aside from the interests of the people and who, to say the most of them, are, taken as a mass, at least one long step removed from honest men" - Abraham Lincoln
"Let us at all times remember that all American citizens are brothers of a common country, and should dwell together in bonds of fraternal feeling" - Abraham Lincoln
"A statesman is he who thinks in the future generations, and a politician is he who thinks in the upcoming elections." - Abraham Lincoln
0 Comments

    Author

    Corey Wallace is a husband, father, believer, skeptic, and sci-fi nut wrapped into one.

    Archives

    February 2014
    January 2013
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011

    Categories

    All
    Citizenship
    Constitution
    Gamers
    Games
    Gaming
    Government
    Justice
    Magazines
    Politics
    Revolution
    Rights
    Terrorism
    Usa
    Word Play

    RSS Feed


Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.